News Archive
The Discrimination of Quantum States: the Quantum Chernoff Divergence
An exciting result from Koenraad Audenaert and Frank Verstraete, with the group of Emili Bagan...
A basic problem in statistics is to discriminate whether a random variable belongs to one or the other of two given distributions. The simplest instance of this problem is to discriminate between a fair coin and an unfair one. To do so, one tosses the coin a sufficient number of times and sees whether heads come up as frequent as tails, or not. In Quantum Information one considers the corresponding problem of discriminating between two quantum states: how can you tell whether a “state factory” is a ρ-factory or a σ-factory, given the promise that these are the only two possibilities? In other words, what is the optimal measurement you can perform on the factory’s output to find this out, with smallest possible error?
The solution to the quantum state discrimination problem was found in the 70’s by Holevo and Helstrom, who gave the optimal measurement operators that minimise the total error probability. They also showed that this minimal error probability decreases exponentially with the number of state copies taken into consideration, just as in classical statistical discrimination, where the error probability decreases exponentially with the number of coin tosses.

But this is not the end of the story. In fact, the rate at which the error probability goes down to 0 can be used as a measure of distinguishability between distributions or quantum states. Indeed: the faster the rate, the easier these distributions or states can be distinguished. The error rate therefore provides a genuine distance measure, with a clear operational meaning and with many other desirable properties.
However nice this distance measure might be, it would be useless if one could not calculate it. Indeed, it is defined as the limit of the rate when the number of copies goes to infinity, and cannot be calculated directly (unless your PC has an infinite amount of memory, and infinite speed). In the statistical setting, this problem was overcome when Herman Chernoff, in a classical paper published in 1952, calculated this limit analytically and found a simple closed-form expression for the error rate, which now bears the name of Chernoff divergence, in his honour. The illustration on the left depicts the simple case of comparing two coins and shows how the error rate (blue) tends to the Chernoff divergence log Q (red), in the limit of large n.
So what about the corresponding problem in quantum state discrimination? Koenraad Audenaert from Imperial College London and Frank Verstraete, now at the
In July 2006, Michael Nussbaum from
Then, just two months later, Koenraad Audenaert from Imperial College London and Frank Verstraete, now at the University of Vienna, in collaboration with the group of Emili Bagan in Barcelona, finally settled the issue by proving that not only does the minimal relative Renyi entropy provide an upper bound to the error rate, it is actually equal to it. Hence, it is the correct quantum generalisation of the Chernoff divergence. Their proof heavily relies on state-of-the-art matrix-analytical methods and beautifully illustrates the power of interdisciplinarity in research.
References:
-
A lower bound of Chernoff type for symmetric quantum hypothesis testing, M. Nussbaum and A. Szkola, quant-ph/0607216.
- The Quantum Chernoff Bound, K. Audenaert, J. Calsamiglia, R. Munoz-Tapia, E. Bagan, Ll. Masanes, A. Acin, and F. Verstraete, quant-ph/0610027
- Quantum Information, An Introduction, M. Hayashi, Springer, 2006.
Previous page: News
Next page: About QIP IRC